linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] Software fwnode references

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 31 May 2019 16:42:21 +0300
From:   Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] Software fwnode references

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 11:29:10AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 5/22/19 12:50 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm not splitting this series in two after all. After thinking about
> > this for some time, I decided to add support for static software
> > nodes. I did not want to support them because I don't want to make it
> > easy to maintain board files, but in end they make the use of the
> > software nodes so much more easier compared to if we always had to
> > dynamically allocate them that it's a no-brainer. The references can
> > now be also described statically. Actually, those can now only be
> > described statically.
> > 
> > Hans! I applied (hopefully) all of the fixes you proposed in v3. I
> > hope you have time to test these.
> 
> I've just ran various tests with the entire series applied and
> everything (superspeed host, superspeed device, DP over Type-C,
> PD charging) seems to work fin, so you can add my:
> 
> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> 
> To the entire series.
> 
> I've 2 very minor nitpicks about the intel_cht_int33fe patches,
> with those fixed, you can also add my:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> 
> To the intel_cht_int33fe patches. I will reply to the
> 2 individual patches for which I've some remarks
> separately.

Thanks Hans! I'll fix those.

Cheers,

-- 
heikki