linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clocksource: arc_timer: use BIT() instead of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 31 May 2019 16:25:54 +0200
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
        linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: arc_timer: use BIT() instead of _BITUL()

On 24/05/2019 07:40, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> This is in-kernel C code, so there is no reason to use _BITUL().
> Replace it with equivalent BIT().
> 
> I added #include <linux/bits.h> explicitly although it has been included
> by other headers eventually.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> ---

Applied, thanks!


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog