linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] acpi: Drop drivers/acpi/hmat/ directory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPcyv4ib1twvDBz6W=JU18JyvtYmyHeAU4iOruRGHf_cY+3Yvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 May 2019 07:52:24 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] acpi: Drop drivers/acpi/hmat/ directory

On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 1:24 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>
> On Friday, May 31, 2019 12:59:27 AM CEST Dan Williams wrote:
> > As a single source file object there is no need for the hmat enabling to
> > have its own directory.
>
> Well, I asked Keith to add that directory as the code in hmat.c is more related to mm than to
> the rest of the ACPI subsystem.

...but hmat/hmat.c does not say anything about mm?

> Is there any problem with retaining it?

It feels redundant for no benefit to type hmat/hmat.c. How about create:

    drivers/acpi/numa/ or drivers/acpi/mm/

...and move numa.c and hmat.c there if you want to separate mm
concerns from the rest of drivers/acpi/?