lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB51345B1DD18AA4CB64BB086EEC190@VI1PR04MB5134.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 May 2019 17:06:07 +0000
From:   Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "stern@...land.harvard.edu" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "marex@...x.de" <marex@...x.de>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
        "noring@...rew.org" <noring@...rew.org>,
        "JuergenUrban@....de" <JuergenUrban@....de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 0/5] prerequisites for device reserved local mem rework

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 7:43 PM
> 
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 02:06:12PM +0000, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> > Thanks, hope this time everything is fine.
> 
> I've applied it to the dma-mapping tree now.
> 
> > When you get the time, please let me know your ideas on the next steps.
> 
> I think the next step is to move the call to
> dma_alloc_from_dev_coherent from dma_alloc_attrs into the ->alloc
> instances.  The only onces that really need it for now are the
> generic and legacy arm dma-direct code, and drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> as well as the ARM DMA API code, as those are the ones use for
> architectures that declare coherent regions.  The other iommus are
> not used on OF platforms (at least that's what my analysis said a while
> ago, feel free to double check it)

Thanks. I'll start looking into it starting next week. Keep in touch.

---
Best Regards, Laurentiu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ