lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AT5PR8401MB1169E817136F8B8587C7A716AB1A0@AT5PR8401MB1169.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date:   Sat, 1 Jun 2019 15:40:07 +0000
From:   "Elliott, Robert (Servers)" <elliott@....com>
To:     "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@...ux.net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "viresh.kumar@...aro.org" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        "jdelvare@...e.com" <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        "linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        "khalid@...ehiking.org" <khalid@...ehiking.org>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "aacraid@...rosemi.com" <aacraid@...rosemi.com>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3] drivers: scsi: remove unnecessary #ifdef MODULE



> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org <linux-kernel-
> owner@...r.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
> Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2019 9:02 AM
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] drivers: scsi: remove unnecessary #ifdef MODULE
> 
> The MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() macro already checks for MODULE defined,
> so the extra check here is not necessary.
> 
...
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c b/drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c
...
> 
> -#ifdef MODULE
>  static struct pci_device_id dptids[] = {
>  	{ PCI_DPT_VENDOR_ID, PCI_DPT_DEVICE_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,
> PCI_ANY_ID,},
>  	{ PCI_DPT_VENDOR_ID, PCI_DPT_RAPTOR_DEVICE_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,
> PCI_ANY_ID,},
>  	{ 0, }
>  };
> -#endif
> -
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci,dptids);

I don't see any reply to James' comment that these changes result in
static struct definitions that are unused, which should result in
complaints by the compiler like:
    warning: 'dptids' defined by not used [-Wunused-variable]


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ