linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: clean up asym packing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKfTPtCU_+YJgMVpk-CKhetqTbOcNWVOmbUOD_xuTJqSD64J=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Jun 2019 20:32:12 +0200
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: clean up asym packing

On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 20:15, Valentin Schneider
<valentin.schneider@....com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 03/06/2019 15:17, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Clean up asym packing to follow the default load balance behavior:
> > - classify the group by creating a group_asym_capacity field.
>
> Being nitpicky here, this doesn't classify the group in the usual way
> - it doesn't get a specific group_type value (group_classify()). So maybe
> "classify" isn't the best term here.

My original goal was to add a group type to classify the group but
this would have broken the current behavior whereas I only want to
move code

>
> Also, why tag this group in update_sd_pick_busiest()? It would make more
> sense to do so in update_sg_lb_stats() like with the other sg_lb_stats fields:

With your proposal below, the test is called for every groups'
statistic update whereas it is only done lastly after checking other
rules in the current code and I don't want to modify the current
behavior but only move code to set imbalance in calculate imbalance.

A bigger cleanup will come in next steps

>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 93c24473c8a0..537710026c3a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -8298,6 +8298,10 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
>                 }
>         }
>
> +       if (sgs->sum_nr_running &&
> +           sched_asym_prefer(env->dst_cpu, group->asym_prefer_cpu))
> +               sgs->group_asym_capacity = 1;
> +
>         /* Adjust by relative CPU capacity of the group */
>         sgs->group_capacity = group->sgc->capacity;
>         sgs->avg_load = (sgs->group_load*SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) / sgs->group_capacity;
> @@ -8391,9 +8395,7 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
>          * perform better since they share less core resources.  Hence when we
>          * have idle threads, we want them to be the higher ones.
>          */
> -       if (sgs->sum_nr_running &&
> -           sched_asym_prefer(env->dst_cpu, sg->asym_prefer_cpu)) {
> -               sgs->group_asym_capacity = 1;
> +       if (sgs->group_asym_capacity) {
>                 if (!sds->busiest)
>                         return true;
>