linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] fTPM: firmware TPM running in TEE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190603211648.GV12898@sasha-vm>
Date:   Mon, 3 Jun 2019 17:16:48 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca, corbet@....net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...rosoft.com,
        thiruan@...rosoft.com, bryankel@...rosoft.com,
        tee-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] fTPM: firmware TPM running in TEE

On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 11:28:15PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 11:27:56AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> Changes since v3:
>>
>>  - Address comments by Jarkko Sakkinen
>>  - Address comments by Igor Opaniuk
>>
>> Sasha Levin (2):
>>   fTPM: firmware TPM running in TEE
>>   fTPM: add documentation for ftpm driver
>
>I think patches start to look proper but I wonder can anyone test
>these? I don't think before that I can merge these.

They're all functionally tested by us on actual hardware before being
sent out.

The reference implementation is open and being kept updated, and an
interested third party should be able to verify the correctness of these
patches. However, it doesn't look like there's an interested third party
given that these patches have been out for a few months now.

--
Thanks,
Sasha