[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190603072400.GD4797@dell>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 08:24:00 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: broonie@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tony.xie@...k-chips.com, zhangqing@...k-chips.com,
huangtao@...k-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] support a new rk80x pmic-variants (rk817 and
rk809)
On Wed, 08 May 2019, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> I've picked up and rebased Tony's patch-series for rk809 and rk817.
> From the last iteration it looks like the regulator-portion did
> fall through the cracks, the other patches seem to be sufficiently
> reviewed/acked.
>
> The regulator-patch could either just be picked alone to the regulator-
> tree or with an Ack go through the mfd tree with the other patches.
>
>
> Original cover-letter + changelog follows:
>
> Most of functions and registers of the rk817 and rk808 are the same,
> so they can share allmost all codes.
>
> Their specifications are as follows:
> 1) The RK809 and RK809 consist of 5 DCDCs, 9 LDOs and have the same
> registers
> for these components except dcdc5.
> 2) The dcdc5 is a boost dcdc for RK817 and is a buck for RK809.
> 3) The RK817 has one switch but The Rk809 has two.
Looks like this set is still lacking a Regulator Ack.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists