[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190603074112.GB11812@ming.t460p>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 15:41:13 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Minwoo Im <minwoo.im@...sung.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq/affinity: remove unused arg when building aff mask
On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 08:21:17PM +0900, Minwoo Im wrote:
> When building affinity masks, the struct irq_affinity *affd is not
> needed because irq_create_affinity_masks() has already given a cursored
> current vector after pre_vectors via "curvec".
>
> This patch removes unused argument for irq_build_affinity_masks() and
> __irq_build_affinity_masks(). No functions changes are included.
>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
> Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@...il.com>
> ---
> kernel/irq/affinity.c | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> index f18cd5aa33e8..4352b08ae48d 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> @@ -94,8 +94,7 @@ static int get_nodes_in_cpumask(cpumask_var_t *node_to_cpumask,
> return nodes;
> }
>
> -static int __irq_build_affinity_masks(const struct irq_affinity *affd,
> - unsigned int startvec,
> +static int __irq_build_affinity_masks(unsigned int startvec,
> unsigned int numvecs,
> unsigned int firstvec,
> cpumask_var_t *node_to_cpumask,
> @@ -171,8 +170,7 @@ static int __irq_build_affinity_masks(const struct irq_affinity *affd,
> * 1) spread present CPU on these vectors
> * 2) spread other possible CPUs on these vectors
> */
> -static int irq_build_affinity_masks(const struct irq_affinity *affd,
> - unsigned int startvec, unsigned int numvecs,
> +static int irq_build_affinity_masks(unsigned int startvec, unsigned int numvecs,
> unsigned int firstvec,
> struct irq_affinity_desc *masks)
> {
> @@ -197,7 +195,7 @@ static int irq_build_affinity_masks(const struct irq_affinity *affd,
> build_node_to_cpumask(node_to_cpumask);
>
> /* Spread on present CPUs starting from affd->pre_vectors */
> - nr_present = __irq_build_affinity_masks(affd, curvec, numvecs,
> + nr_present = __irq_build_affinity_masks(curvec, numvecs,
> firstvec, node_to_cpumask,
> cpu_present_mask, nmsk, masks);
>
> @@ -212,7 +210,7 @@ static int irq_build_affinity_masks(const struct irq_affinity *affd,
> else
> curvec = firstvec + nr_present;
> cpumask_andnot(npresmsk, cpu_possible_mask, cpu_present_mask);
> - nr_others = __irq_build_affinity_masks(affd, curvec, numvecs,
> + nr_others = __irq_build_affinity_masks(curvec, numvecs,
> firstvec, node_to_cpumask,
> npresmsk, nmsk, masks);
> put_online_cpus();
> @@ -295,7 +293,7 @@ irq_create_affinity_masks(unsigned int nvecs, struct irq_affinity *affd)
> unsigned int this_vecs = affd->set_size[i];
> int ret;
>
> - ret = irq_build_affinity_masks(affd, curvec, this_vecs,
> + ret = irq_build_affinity_masks(curvec, this_vecs,
> curvec, masks);
> if (ret) {
> kfree(masks);
> --
> 2.21.0
>
Looks fine:
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists