[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190603074247.hlayod2pxq55f6ci@flea>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 09:42:47 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
To: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: Add lradc node
Hi,
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 12:27:55PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Freitag, 24. Mai 2019 11:20:01 CEST Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >
> > It would be great to drop the -keys from the compatible, and to
> > document the bindings
> >
> > Looks good otherwise
> >
> > Maxime
>
> So I should just document the "allwinner,sun50i-a64-lradc" string in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/sun4i-lradc-keys.txt ? Don't I also
> have to add the compatible to the driver code then? Just adding the a64
> compatible to a dts wouldn't work without that.
What I meant was that you needed both, something like:
compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-lradc", "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-lradc";
That way, the OS will try to match a driver for the A64 compatible if
any, and fallback to the A83's otherwise. And since we don't have any
quirk at the moment, there's no change needed to the driver.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists