[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190603081204.GG4797@dell>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 09:12:04 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: stmfx: Uninitialized variable in stmfx_irq_handler()
On Wed, 15 May 2019, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The problem is that on 64bit systems then we don't clear the higher
> bits of the "pending" variable. So when we do:
>
> ack = pending & ~BIT(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO);
> if (ack) {
>
> the if (ack) condition relies on uninitialized data. The fix it that
> I've changed "pending" from an unsigned long to a u32. I changed "n" as
> well, because that's a number in the 0-10 range and it fits easily
> inside an int. We do need to add a cast to "pending" when we use it in
> the for_each_set_bit() loop, but that doesn't cause a proble, it's
> fine.
>
> Fixes: 06252ade9156 ("mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/stmfx.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Could do with an author's Ack here.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists