[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd7fa062-6c71-13a2-5bbf-0dea859ae75f@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 10:16:21 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM General <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi_host: add support for request batching
On 31/05/19 05:27, Ming Lei wrote:
> It should be fine to implement scsi_commit_rqs() as:
>
> if (shost->hostt->commit_rqs)
> shost->hostt->commit_rqs(shost, hctx->queue_num);
>
> then scsi_mq_ops_no_commit can be saved.
>
> Because .commit_rqs() is only called when BLK_STS_*_RESOURCE is
> returned from scsi_queue_rq(), at that time shost->hostt->commit_rqs should
> have been hit from cache given .queuecommand is called via
> host->hostt->queuecommand.
This is not about d-cache, it's about preserving the heuristics that
blk-mq applies depending on whether commit_rqs is there or not.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists