[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190603090524.509763583@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 11:09:25 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
David Beckett <david.beckett@...ronome.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Dirk van der Merwe <dirk.vandermerwe@...ronome.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 5.1 32/40] net/tls: fix no wakeup on partial reads
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
[ Upstream commit 04b25a5411f966c2e586909a8496553b71876fae ]
When tls_sw_recvmsg() partially copies a record it pops that
record from ctx->recv_pkt and places it on rx_list.
Next iteration of tls_sw_recvmsg() reads from rx_list via
process_rx_list() before it enters the decryption loop.
If there is no more records to be read tls_wait_data()
will put the process on the wait queue and got to sleep.
This is incorrect, because some data was already copied
in process_rx_list().
In case of RPC connections process may never get woken up,
because peer also simply blocks in read().
I think this may also fix a similar issue when BPF is at
play, because after __tcp_bpf_recvmsg() returns some data
we subtract it from len and use continue to restart the
loop, but len could have just reached 0, so again we'd
sleep unnecessarily. That's added by:
commit d3b18ad31f93 ("tls: add bpf support to sk_msg handling")
Fixes: 692d7b5d1f91 ("tls: Fix recvmsg() to be able to peek across multiple records")
Reported-by: David Beckett <david.beckett@...ronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Dirk van der Merwe <dirk.vandermerwe@...ronome.com>
Tested-by: David Beckett <david.beckett@...ronome.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/tls/tls_sw.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -1692,7 +1692,7 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
len = len - copied;
timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
- do {
+ while (len && (decrypted + copied < target || ctx->recv_pkt)) {
bool retain_skb = false;
bool zc = false;
int to_decrypt;
@@ -1823,11 +1823,7 @@ pick_next_record:
} else {
break;
}
-
- /* If we have a new message from strparser, continue now. */
- if (decrypted + copied >= target && !ctx->recv_pkt)
- break;
- } while (len);
+ }
recv_end:
if (num_async) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists