linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] phy: rockchip-dp: Avoid power leak by leaving the PHY power on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 3 Jun 2019 16:50:33 +0530
From:   Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:     Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
CC:     <hl@...k-chips.com>, <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <dbasehore@...omium.org>, <mka@...omium.org>,
        <ryandcase@...omium.org>, <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "nickey.yang (nickey.yang@...k-chips.com)" 
        <nickey.yang@...k-chips.com>, wzz <wzz@...k-chips.com>,
        Huang Jiachai <hjc@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: rockchip-dp: Avoid power leak by leaving the PHY
 power on

Hi,

On 20/05/19 1:34 PM, Caesar Wang wrote:
> Hi Doug,
> 
> For now,  nobody of rockchip is responsible for this driver.
> Cc: Nickey, Zain, Hjc
> 
> 
> On 5/8/19 7:48 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
>> While testing a newer kernel on rk3288-based Chromebooks I found that
>> the power draw in suspend was higher on newer kernels compared to the
>> downstream Chrome OS 3.14 kernel.  Specifically the power of an
>> rk3288-veyron-jerry board that I tested (as measured by the smart
>> battery) was ~16 mA on Chrome OS 3.14 and ~21 mA on a newer kernel.
>>
>> I tracked the regression down to the fact that the "DP PHY" driver
>> didn't exist in our downstream 3.14.  We relied on the eDP driver to
>> turn on the clock and relied on the fact that the power for the PHY
>> was default turned on.
>>
>> Specifically the thing that caused the power regression was turning
>> the eDP PHY _off_.  Presumably there is some sort of power leak in the
>> system and when we turn the PHY off something is leaching power from
>> something else and causing excessive power draw.
>>
>> Doing a search through device trees shows that this PHY is only ever
>> used on rk3288.  Presumably this power leak is present on all
>> rk3288-SoCs running upstream Linux so let's just whack the driver to
>> make sure we never turn off power.  We'll still leave the parts that
>> turn _on_ the power and grab the clock, though.
>>
>> NOTES:
>> A) If someone can identify what this power leak is and fix it in some
>>     other way we can revert this patch.
>> B) If someone can show that their particular board doesn't have this
>>     power leak (maybe they have rails hooked up differently?) we can
>>     perhaps add a device tree property indicating that for some boards
>>     it's OK to turn this rail off.  I don't want to add this property
>>     until I know of a board that needs it.
>>
>> Fixes: fd968973de95 ("phy: Add driver for rockchip Display Port PHY")
>> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> 
> 
> Reviewed-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>
> 
>> ---
>> As far as I know Yakir (the original author) is no longer at Rockchip.
>> I've added a few other Rockchip people and hopefully one of them can
>> help direct even if they're not directly responsible.
>>
>>   drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-dp.c | 11 +++++++----
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-dp.c
>> b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-dp.c
>> index 8b267a746576..10bbcd69d6f5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-dp.c
>> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ struct rockchip_dp_phy {
>>   static int rockchip_set_phy_state(struct phy *phy, bool enable)
>>   {
>>       struct rockchip_dp_phy *dp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>> -    int ret;
>> +    int ret = 0;
>>         if (enable) {
>>           ret = regmap_write(dp->grf, GRF_SOC_CON12,
>> @@ -50,9 +50,12 @@ static int rockchip_set_phy_state(struct phy *phy, bool
>> enable)
>>       } else {
>>           clk_disable_unprepare(dp->phy_24m);
>>   -        ret = regmap_write(dp->grf, GRF_SOC_CON12,
>> -                   GRF_EDP_PHY_SIDDQ_HIWORD_MASK |
>> -                   GRF_EDP_PHY_SIDDQ_OFF);
>> +        /*
>> +         * Intentionally don't turn SIDDQ off when disabling
>> +         * the PHY.  There is a power leak on rk3288 and
>> +         * suspend power _increases_ by 5 mA if you turn this
>> +         * off.
>> +         */

Can someone in Rockchip try to find the root-cause of the issue? Keeping the
PHY off shouldn't increase power draw.

Thanks
Kishon