[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B93B6DF@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 11:40:37 +0000
From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To: Biao Huang <biao.huang@...iatek.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"yt.shen@...iatek.com" <yt.shen@...iatek.com>,
"jianguo.zhang@...iatek.com" <jianguo.zhang@...iatek.com>,
"boon.leong.ong@...el.com" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [v2, PATCH 3/4] net: stmmac: modify default value of tx-frames
From: Biao Huang <biao.huang@...iatek.com>
> the default value of tx-frames is 25, it's too late when
> passing tstamp to stack, then the ptp4l will fail:
>
> ptp4l -i eth0 -f gPTP.cfg -m
> ptp4l: selected /dev/ptp0 as PTP clock
> ptp4l: port 1: INITIALIZING to LISTENING on INITIALIZE
> ptp4l: port 0: INITIALIZING to LISTENING on INITIALIZE
> ptp4l: port 1: link up
> ptp4l: timed out while polling for tx timestamp
> ptp4l: increasing tx_timestamp_timeout may correct this issue,
> but it is likely caused by a driver bug
> ptp4l: port 1: send peer delay response failed
> ptp4l: port 1: LISTENING to FAULTY on FAULT_DETECTED (FT_UNSPECIFIED)
>
> ptp4l tests pass when changing the tx-frames from 25 to 1 with
> ethtool -C option.
> It should be fine to set tx-frames default value to 1, so ptp4l will pass
> by default.
I'm not sure if this is the right approach ... What's the timeout value
you have for TX Timestamp ?
Thanks,
Jose Miguel Abreu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists