linux-kernel - [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in validate_chain() and check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 3 Jun 2019 06:12:55 -0700
From:   tip-bot for Yuyang Du <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     hpa@...or.com, bvanassche@....org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, duyuyang@...il.com,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in
 validate_chain() and check_deadlock()

Commit-ID:  0b9fc8ecfa30000c8900da7adbbef23438de9ec0
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/0b9fc8ecfa30000c8900da7adbbef23438de9ec0
Author:     Yuyang Du <duyuyang@...il.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 6 May 2019 16:19:26 +0800
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 11:55:44 +0200

locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in validate_chain() and check_deadlock()

The lockdep_map argument in them is not used, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: frederic@...nel.org
Cc: ming.lei@...hat.com
Cc: will.deacon@....com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-11-duyuyang@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 3eecae315885..6cf14c84eb6d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2230,8 +2230,7 @@ print_deadlock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
  * Returns: 0 on deadlock detected, 1 on OK, 2 on recursive read
  */
 static int
-check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next,
-	       struct lockdep_map *next_instance, int read)
+check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next, int read)
 {
 	struct held_lock *prev;
 	struct held_lock *nest = NULL;
@@ -2789,8 +2788,9 @@ cache_hit:
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
-		struct held_lock *hlock, int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
+static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr,
+			  struct held_lock *hlock,
+			  int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
 {
 	/*
 	 * Trylock needs to maintain the stack of held locks, but it
@@ -2816,7 +2816,7 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
 		 * any of these scenarios could lead to a deadlock. If
 		 * All validations
 		 */
-		int ret = check_deadlock(curr, hlock, lock, hlock->read);
+		int ret = check_deadlock(curr, hlock, hlock->read);
 
 		if (!ret)
 			return 0;
@@ -2847,8 +2847,8 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
 }
 #else
 static inline int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr,
-	       	struct lockdep_map *lock, struct held_lock *hlock,
-		int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
+				 struct held_lock *hlock,
+				 int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
 {
 	return 1;
 }
@@ -3826,7 +3826,7 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(!hlock_class(hlock)->key);
 	}
 
-	if (!validate_chain(curr, lock, hlock, chain_head, chain_key))
+	if (!validate_chain(curr, hlock, chain_head, chain_key))
 		return 0;
 
 	curr->curr_chain_key = chain_key;