[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-4609c4f963f353613812f999bb027aac795bcde8@git.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 06:18:04 -0700
From: tip-bot for Yuyang Du <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, duyuyang@...il.com,
hpa@...or.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: [tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Remove redundant argument in
check_deadlock
Commit-ID: 4609c4f963f353613812f999bb027aac795bcde8
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/4609c4f963f353613812f999bb027aac795bcde8
Author: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@...il.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 6 May 2019 16:19:33 +0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 11:55:49 +0200
locking/lockdep: Remove redundant argument in check_deadlock
In check_deadlock(), the third argument read comes from the second
argument hlock so that it can be removed. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: bvanassche@....org
Cc: frederic@...nel.org
Cc: ming.lei@...hat.com
Cc: will.deacon@....com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-18-duyuyang@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index b2ca20aa69aa..be4c1348ddcd 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2246,7 +2246,7 @@ print_deadlock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
* Returns: 0 on deadlock detected, 1 on OK, 2 on recursive read
*/
static int
-check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next, int read)
+check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
{
struct held_lock *prev;
struct held_lock *nest = NULL;
@@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next, int read)
* Allow read-after-read recursion of the same
* lock class (i.e. read_lock(lock)+read_lock(lock)):
*/
- if ((read == 2) && prev->read)
+ if ((next->read == 2) && prev->read)
return 2;
/*
@@ -2839,7 +2839,7 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr,
* The simple case: does the current hold the same lock
* already?
*/
- int ret = check_deadlock(curr, hlock, hlock->read);
+ int ret = check_deadlock(curr, hlock);
if (!ret)
return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists