linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] mtd: nand: raw: brcmnand: Refactored code and introduced inline functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 3 Jun 2019 16:18:25 +0200
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
To:     Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>
Cc:     MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mtd: nand: raw: brcmnand: Refactored code and
 introduced inline functions

On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 10:11:20 -0400
Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com> wrote:

> Boris,
> 
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 3:57 AM Boris Brezillon
> <boris.brezillon@...labora.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 30 May 2019 17:20:35 -0400
> > Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com> wrote:
> >  
> > > Refactored NAND ECC and CMD address configuration code to use inline
> > > functions.  
> >
> > I'd expect the compiler to be smart enough to decide when inlining is
> > appropriate. Did you check that adding the inline specifier actually
> > makes a difference?  
> 
> This was done to make the code more readable. It does not make any
> difference to performance.

I meant dropping the inline specifier, not going back to manual
inlining. As a general rule, you don't need to add the 'inline'
specifier unless your function is defined in a header. In all other
cases the compiler is able to inline things on its own when it sees the
number of instructions is small enough or when the function is only
called once.