[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPed=npnfk0H2WUDityHg5cPLH_zwShyRd+B2RS8h6C7SQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 16:35:22 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG BISECT] bug mm/vmalloc.c:470 (mm/vmalloc.c: get rid of one
single unlink_va() when merge)
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 16:32, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 16:10:40 +0200 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Indeed it looks like effect of merge conflict resolution or applying.
> > When I look at MMOTS, it is the same as yours:
> > http://git.cmpxchg.org/cgit.cgi/linux-mmots.git/commit/?id=b77b8cce67f246109f9d87417a32cd38f0398f2f
> >
> > However in linux-next it is different.
> >
> > Stephen, any thoughts?
>
> Have you had a look at today's linux-next? It looks correct in
> there. Andrew updated his patch series over the weekend.
Yes, I am looking at today's next. Both the source code and the commit
728e0fbf263e3ed359c10cb13623390564102881 have wrong "if (merged)" (put
in wrong hunk).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists