[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190602.180334.1932703293092139564.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2019 18:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sgarzare@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, stefanha@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, mst@...hat.com,
jasowang@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] vsock/virtio: fix locking for fwd_cnt and
buf_alloc
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 15:39:51 +0200
> @@ -434,7 +434,9 @@ void virtio_transport_set_buffer_size(struct vsock_sock *vsk, u64 val)
> if (val > vvs->buf_size_max)
> vvs->buf_size_max = val;
> vvs->buf_size = val;
> + spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> vvs->buf_alloc = val;
> + spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
This locking doesn't do anything other than to strongly order the
buf_size store to occur before the buf_alloc one.
If you need a memory barrier, use one.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists