linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH 4/5] arm64: Add support for arch_memremap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5cf6a24c.1c69fb81.c970e.907e@mx.google.com>
Date:   Tue, 04 Jun 2019 09:54:35 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 4/5] arm64: Add support for arch_memremap_ro()

Quoting Catalin Marinas (2019-06-03 08:56:13)
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 09:47:45AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Pass in PAGE_KERNEL_RO to the underlying IO mapping mechanism to get a
> > read-only mapping for the MEMREMAP_RO type of memory mappings that
> > memremap() supports.
> > 
> > Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> 
> Not sure what the plans are with this series but if you need an ack for
> arm64:
> 
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>

Thanks. I'll resend without the RFC tag and see how it goes.