[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW3ChMmeFY2cK0R61sc90BBArytdzMP4nscqCOpf56f1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 21:32:07 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Rough draft document on merging and rebasing
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 9:09 PM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 11:42:48 -0400
> "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> > Finally, I'm bit concerned about anything which states absolutes,
> > because there are people who tend to be real stickler for the rules,
> > and if they see something stated in absolute terms, they fail to
> > understand that there are exceptions that are well understood, and in
> > use for years before the existence of the document which is trying to
> > codify best practices.
>
> Hence the "there are exceptions" text at the bottom of the document :)
>
> Anyway, I'll rework it to try to take your comments into account. Maybe
> we should consistently say "rebasing" for changing the parent commit of a
> patch set, and "history modification" for the other tricks...?
Or just "reworking a branch" for the other tricks?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists