[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190604200951.GB29739@sasha-vm>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 16:09:51 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Cc: peterhuewe@....de,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
jgg@...pe.ca, corbet@....net,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
Microsoft Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...rosoft.com>,
Thirupathaiah Annapureddy <thiruan@...rosoft.com>,
"Bryan Kelly (CSI)" <bryankel@...rosoft.com>,
tee-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] fTPM: firmware TPM running in TEE
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 11:45:52AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
>On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 20:58, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
>> + /* Open context with TEE driver */
>> + pvt_data->ctx = tee_client_open_context(NULL, ftpm_tee_match, NULL,
>> + NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(pvt_data->ctx)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "%s:tee_client_open_context failed\n", __func__);
>
>Is this well tested? I see this misleading error multiple times as
>follows although TEE driver works pretty well.
Yes, this was all functionally tested.
Why is this error message misleading? I'd be happy to fix it.
>Module built with "CONFIG_TCG_FTPM_TEE=y"
>
>[ 1.436878] ftpm-tee tpm@0: ftpm_tee_probe:tee_client_open_context failed
>[ 1.509471] ftpm-tee tpm@0: ftpm_tee_probe:tee_client_open_context failed
>[ 1.517268] ftpm-tee tpm@0: ftpm_tee_probe:tee_client_open_context failed
>[ 1.525596] ftpm-tee tpm@0: ftpm_tee_probe:tee_client_open_context failed
Does the TEE have the fTPM implementation and such? Could you provide
details about your testing environment (hardware, fTPM verions, etc)?
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists