| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190604232532.7953-4-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 19:25:25 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Li Rongqing <lirongqing@...du.com>, Zhang Yu <zhangyu31@...du.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 04/10] ipc: prevent lockup on alloc_msg and free_msg
From: Li Rongqing <lirongqing@...du.com>
[ Upstream commit d6a2946a88f524a47cc9b79279667137899db807 ]
msgctl10 of ltp triggers the following lockup When CONFIG_KASAN is
enabled on large memory SMP systems, the pages initialization can take a
long time, if msgctl10 requests a huge block memory, and it will block
rcu scheduler, so release cpu actively.
After adding schedule() in free_msg, free_msg can not be called when
holding spinlock, so adding msg to a tmp list, and free it out of
spinlock
rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
rcu: Tasks blocked on level-1 rcu_node (CPUs 16-31): P32505
rcu: Tasks blocked on level-1 rcu_node (CPUs 48-63): P34978
rcu: (detected by 11, t=35024 jiffies, g=44237529, q=16542267)
msgctl10 R running task 21608 32505 2794 0x00000082
Call Trace:
preempt_schedule_irq+0x4c/0xb0
retint_kernel+0x1b/0x2d
RIP: 0010:__is_insn_slot_addr+0xfb/0x250
Code: 82 1d 00 48 8b 9b 90 00 00 00 4c 89 f7 49 c1 ee 03 e8 59 83 1d 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 39 eb 48 89 9d 58 ff ff ff <41> c6 04 06 f8 74 66 4c 8d 75 98 4c 89 f1 48 c1 e9 03 48 01 c8 48
RSP: 0018:ffff88bce041f758 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13
RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffffffff8471bc50 RCX: ffffffff828a2a57
RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: dffffc0000000000 RDI: ffff88bce041f780
RBP: ffff88bce041f828 R08: ffffed15f3f4c5b3 R09: ffffed15f3f4c5b3
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed15f3f4c5b2 R12: 000000318aee9b73
R13: ffffffff8471bc50 R14: 1ffff1179c083ef0 R15: 1ffff1179c083eec
kernel_text_address+0xc1/0x100
__kernel_text_address+0xe/0x30
unwind_get_return_address+0x2f/0x50
__save_stack_trace+0x92/0x100
create_object+0x380/0x650
__kmalloc+0x14c/0x2b0
load_msg+0x38/0x1a0
do_msgsnd+0x19e/0xcf0
do_syscall_64+0x117/0x400
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
rcu: Tasks blocked on level-1 rcu_node (CPUs 0-15): P32170
rcu: (detected by 14, t=35016 jiffies, g=44237525, q=12423063)
msgctl10 R running task 21608 32170 32155 0x00000082
Call Trace:
preempt_schedule_irq+0x4c/0xb0
retint_kernel+0x1b/0x2d
RIP: 0010:lock_acquire+0x4d/0x340
Code: 48 81 ec c0 00 00 00 45 89 c6 4d 89 cf 48 8d 6c 24 20 48 89 3c 24 48 8d bb e4 0c 00 00 89 74 24 0c 48 c7 44 24 20 b3 8a b5 41 <48> c1 ed 03 48 c7 44 24 28 b4 25 18 84 48 c7 44 24 30 d0 54 7a 82
RSP: 0018:ffff88af83417738 EFLAGS: 00000282 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13
RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff88bd335f3080 RCX: 0000000000000002
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88bd335f3d64
RBP: ffff88af83417758 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed13f3f745b2 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
is_bpf_text_address+0x32/0xe0
kernel_text_address+0xec/0x100
__kernel_text_address+0xe/0x30
unwind_get_return_address+0x2f/0x50
__save_stack_trace+0x92/0x100
save_stack+0x32/0xb0
__kasan_slab_free+0x130/0x180
kfree+0xfa/0x2d0
free_msg+0x24/0x50
do_msgrcv+0x508/0xe60
do_syscall_64+0x117/0x400
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
Davidlohr said:
"So after releasing the lock, the msg rbtree/list is empty and new
calls will not see those in the newly populated tmp_msg list, and
therefore they cannot access the delayed msg freeing pointers, which
is good. Also the fact that the node_cache is now freed before the
actual messages seems to be harmless as this is wanted for
msg_insert() avoiding GFP_ATOMIC allocations, and after releasing the
info->lock the thing is freed anyway so it should not change things"
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1552029161-4957-1-git-send-email-lirongqing@baidu.com
Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yu <zhangyu31@...du.com>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
ipc/mqueue.c | 10 ++++++++--
ipc/msgutil.c | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ipc/mqueue.c b/ipc/mqueue.c
index 5e24eb0ab5dd..6ed74825ab54 100644
--- a/ipc/mqueue.c
+++ b/ipc/mqueue.c
@@ -373,7 +373,8 @@ static void mqueue_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
struct user_struct *user;
unsigned long mq_bytes, mq_treesize;
struct ipc_namespace *ipc_ns;
- struct msg_msg *msg;
+ struct msg_msg *msg, *nmsg;
+ LIST_HEAD(tmp_msg);
clear_inode(inode);
@@ -384,10 +385,15 @@ static void mqueue_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
info = MQUEUE_I(inode);
spin_lock(&info->lock);
while ((msg = msg_get(info)) != NULL)
- free_msg(msg);
+ list_add_tail(&msg->m_list, &tmp_msg);
kfree(info->node_cache);
spin_unlock(&info->lock);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(msg, nmsg, &tmp_msg, m_list) {
+ list_del(&msg->m_list);
+ free_msg(msg);
+ }
+
/* Total amount of bytes accounted for the mqueue */
mq_treesize = info->attr.mq_maxmsg * sizeof(struct msg_msg) +
min_t(unsigned int, info->attr.mq_maxmsg, MQ_PRIO_MAX) *
diff --git a/ipc/msgutil.c b/ipc/msgutil.c
index ed81aafd2392..9467307487f7 100644
--- a/ipc/msgutil.c
+++ b/ipc/msgutil.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/utsname.h>
#include <linux/proc_ns.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
#include "util.h"
@@ -66,6 +67,9 @@ static struct msg_msg *alloc_msg(size_t len)
pseg = &msg->next;
while (len > 0) {
struct msg_msgseg *seg;
+
+ cond_resched();
+
alen = min(len, DATALEN_SEG);
seg = kmalloc(sizeof(*seg) + alen, GFP_KERNEL);
if (seg == NULL)
@@ -178,6 +182,8 @@ void free_msg(struct msg_msg *msg)
kfree(msg);
while (seg != NULL) {
struct msg_msgseg *tmp = seg->next;
+
+ cond_resched();
kfree(seg);
seg = tmp;
}
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists