[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190604232212.6753-20-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 19:21:30 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: James Smart <jsmart2021@...il.com>,
Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.1 20/60] scsi: lpfc: add check for loss of ndlp when sending RRQ
From: James Smart <jsmart2021@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit c8cb261a072c88ca1aff0e804a30db4c7606521b ]
There was a missing qualification of a valid ndlp structure when calling to
send an RRQ for an abort. Add the check.
Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <jsmart2021@...il.com>
Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
index fc077cb87900..965f8a1a8f67 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
@@ -7338,7 +7338,10 @@ int
lpfc_send_rrq(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_node_rrq *rrq)
{
struct lpfc_nodelist *ndlp = lpfc_findnode_did(rrq->vport,
- rrq->nlp_DID);
+ rrq->nlp_DID);
+ if (!ndlp)
+ return 1;
+
if (lpfc_test_rrq_active(phba, ndlp, rrq->xritag))
return lpfc_issue_els_rrq(rrq->vport, ndlp,
rrq->nlp_DID, rrq);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists