[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de4622b3-73ad-2963-1943-4ef270956e6b@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 14:37:34 +0800
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: show the error number when
driver_sysfs_add() fails
On 2019/6/4 13:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 12:15:46PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> If driver_sysfs_add() fails, kernel shows following message,
>>
>> really_probe: driver_sysfs_add(portman.0) failed
>> ppdev: probe of portman.0 failed with error 0
>>
>> It's better to show the error number like other probe_failed path.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/dd.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
>> index 0df9b4461766..04ee4e196530 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
>> @@ -493,7 +493,8 @@ static int really_probe(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
>> goto probe_failed;
>> }
>>
>> - if (driver_sysfs_add(dev)) {
>> + ret = driver_sysfs_add(dev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> printk(KERN_ERR "%s: driver_sysfs_add(%s) failed\n",
>> __func__, dev_name(dev));
> Shouldn't this be where the error number is shown? No need for all
> callers to also show the same thing.
Like the message shown as above, there is a common path to show all the probe error info,
"ppdev: probe of portman.0 failed with error 0"
but the driver_sysfs_add() error handling won't fill with ret, so error '0' is shown.
after this patch,
really_probe: driver_sysfs_add(portman.0) failed
ppdev: probe of portman.0 failed with error -12
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists