[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190604232212.6753-5-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 19:21:15 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
syzbot+e4c8abb920efa77bace9@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.1 05/60] ALSA: seq: Cover unsubscribe_port() in list_mutex
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
[ Upstream commit 7c32ae35fbf9cffb7aa3736f44dec10c944ca18e ]
The call of unsubscribe_port() which manages the group count and
module refcount from delete_and_unsubscribe_port() looks racy; it's
not covered by the group list lock, and it's likely a cause of the
reported unbalance at port deletion. Let's move the call inside the
group list_mutex to plug the hole.
Reported-by: syzbot+e4c8abb920efa77bace9@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c b/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c
index a31e16cc012e..16289aefb443 100644
--- a/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c
+++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_ports.c
@@ -550,10 +550,10 @@ static void delete_and_unsubscribe_port(struct snd_seq_client *client,
list_del_init(list);
grp->exclusive = 0;
write_unlock_irq(&grp->list_lock);
- up_write(&grp->list_mutex);
if (!empty)
unsubscribe_port(client, port, grp, &subs->info, ack);
+ up_write(&grp->list_mutex);
}
/* connect two ports */
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists