[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFgQCTtUdeq=M=SrVwvggR15Yk+i=ndLkhkw1dxJa7miuDp_AA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 15:13:21 +0800
From: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] mm/gup: fix omission of check on FOLL_LONGTERM in get_user_pages_fast()
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 12:42 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_CMA)
>
> You can just use #ifdef here.
>
OK.
> > +static inline int reject_cma_pages(int nr_pinned, unsigned int gup_flags,
> > + struct page **pages)
>
> Please use two instead of one tab to indent the continuing line of
> a function declaration.
>
Is it a convention? scripts/checkpatch.pl can not detect it. Could you
show me some light so later I can avoid it?
Thanks for your review.
Regards,
Pingfan
> > +{
> > + if (unlikely(gup_flags & FOLL_LONGTERM)) {
>
> IMHO it would be a little nicer if we could move this into the caller.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists