linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] f2fs: Fix accounting for unusable blocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2fbeda5b-50d6-a8c2-06a9-dddf5d466de8@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:46:43 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC:     Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] f2fs: Fix accounting for unusable blocks

On 2019/6/4 4:26, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 06/03, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2019/5/30 8:49, Daniel Rosenberg wrote:
>>> Fixes possible underflows when dealing with unusable blocks.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@...gle.com>
>>> ---
>>>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 15 ++++++++++-----
>>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> index 9b3d9977cd1ef..a39cc4ffeb4b1 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> @@ -1769,8 +1769,12 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>  
>>>  	if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode, true))
>>>  		avail_user_block_count -= F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks;
>>> -	if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)))
>>> -		avail_user_block_count -= sbi->unusable_block_count;
>>> +	if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))) {
>>> +		if (avail_user_block_count > sbi->unusable_block_count)
>>> +			avail_user_block_count = 0;
>>
>> avail_user_block_count -= sbi->unusable_block_count;
>>
>>> +		else
>>> +			avail_user_block_count -= sbi->unusable_block_count;
>>
>> avail_user_block_count = 0;
>>
> 
> I fixed this.

Okay, if there is no v4, please add

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
>> Thanks,
>>
>>> +	}
>>>  	if (unlikely(sbi->total_valid_block_count > avail_user_block_count)) {
>>>  		diff = sbi->total_valid_block_count - avail_user_block_count;
>>>  		if (diff > *count)
>>> @@ -1970,7 +1974,7 @@ static inline int inc_valid_node_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>  					struct inode *inode, bool is_inode)
>>>  {
>>>  	block_t	valid_block_count;
>>> -	unsigned int valid_node_count;
>>> +	unsigned int valid_node_count, user_block_count;
>>>  	int err;
>>>  
>>>  	if (is_inode) {
>>> @@ -1997,10 +2001,11 @@ static inline int inc_valid_node_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>  
>>>  	if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode, false))
>>>  		valid_block_count += F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks;
>>> +	user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count;
>>>  	if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)))
>>> -		valid_block_count += sbi->unusable_block_count;
>>> +		user_block_count -= sbi->unusable_block_count;
>>>  
>>> -	if (unlikely(valid_block_count > sbi->user_block_count)) {
>>> +	if (unlikely(valid_block_count > user_block_count)) {
>>>  		spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
>>>  		goto enospc;
>>>  	}
>>>
> .
>