linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 46/57] driver: Add variants of driver_find

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hOqnBW3Tjo+iBq1BNzXPaebquOQ=Z1Mpvnj+0fSh6WFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:33:12 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 46/57] driver: Add variants of driver_find_device()

On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 12:55 PM Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 04/06/2019 09:45, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 03/06/2019 20:10, Greg KH wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 04:50:12PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> >>> Add a wrappers to lookup a device by name for a given driver, by various
> >>> generic properties of a device. This can avoid the proliferation of custom
> >>> match functions throughout the drivers.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> >>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> >>> ---
> >>>    include/linux/device.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>    1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> You should put the "here are the new functions that everyone can use"
> >> much earlier in the patch series, otherwise it's hard to dig out.
> >
> > Sure, I will add it in the respective commits.
> >
> >>
> >> And if you send just those as an individual series, and they look good,
> >> I can queue them up now so that everyone else can take the individual
> >> patches through their respective trees.
> >
> > I see. I think I may be able to do that.
>
> The API change patch (i.e, "drivers: Unify the match prototype for
> bus_find_device with class_find_device" ) is tricky and prevents us from doing
> this. So, that patch has to come via your tree as it must be a one shot change.
> And that would make the individual subsystem patches conflict with your tree.
> Also, it would break the builds until the individual subsystem trees are merged
> with your tree with the new API.
>
> So I am not quite sure what the best approach here would be.

It looks like you need to consolidate the prototypes of
bus_find_device() and class_find_device() in the first place, so all
of the changes this depends one need to go into one series and through
the Greg's tree.

Then, you need the new helpers to be defined on top of that and I
would introduce them in another patch series once the first step above
has been completed.

Finally, some code in multiple places needs to be changed to use the
new helpers and that can be done in many smaller steps with individual
changes going in through the respective subsystem trees of theirs.