linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rose: af_rose: avoid overflows in rose

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5CF66E8E.1050100@bfs.de>
Date:   Tue, 04 Jun 2019 15:13:50 +0200
From:   walter harms <wharms@....de>
To:     Young Xiao <92siuyang@...il.com>
CC:     ralf@...ux-mips.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rose: af_rose: avoid overflows in rose_setsockopt()



Am 04.06.2019 14:11, schrieb Young Xiao:
> Check setsockopt arguments to avoid overflows and return -EINVAL for
> too large arguments.
> 
> See commit 32288eb4d940 ("netrom: avoid overflows in nr_setsockopt()")
> for details.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Young Xiao <92siuyang@...il.com>
> ---
>  net/rose/af_rose.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/rose/af_rose.c b/net/rose/af_rose.c
> index e274bc6..af831ee9 100644
> --- a/net/rose/af_rose.c
> +++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c
> @@ -372,15 +372,15 @@ static int rose_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
>  {
>  	struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
>  	struct rose_sock *rose = rose_sk(sk);
> -	int opt;
> +	unsigned long opt;
>  
>  	if (level != SOL_ROSE)
>  		return -ENOPROTOOPT;
>  
> -	if (optlen < sizeof(int))
> +	if (optlen < sizeof(unsigned int))
>  		return -EINVAL;

I do not thing that this will change much,
but maybe you would like to check against the sizeof (opt) here ?


>  
> -	if (get_user(opt, (int __user *)optval))
> +	if (get_user(opt, (unsigned int __user *)optval))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  
>  	switch (optname) {
> @@ -389,31 +389,31 @@ static int rose_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
>  		return 0;
>  


>  	case ROSE_T1:
> -		if (opt < 1)
> +		if (opt < 1 || opt > ULONG_MAX / HZ)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		rose->t1 = opt * HZ;
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	case ROSE_T2:
> -		if (opt < 1)
> +		if (opt < 1 || opt > ULONG_MAX / HZ)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		rose->t2 = opt * HZ;
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	case ROSE_T3:
> -		if (opt < 1)
> +		if (opt < 1 || opt > ULONG_MAX / HZ)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		rose->t3 = opt * HZ;
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	case ROSE_HOLDBACK:
> -		if (opt < 1)
> +		if (opt < 1 || opt > ULONG_MAX / HZ)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		rose->hb = opt * HZ;
>  		return 0;

 you can simplify this jungle by checking and calculation first
 and then set the correct rose->XX

>  
>  	case ROSE_IDLE:
> -		if (opt < 0)
> +		if (opt < 0 || opt > ULONG_MAX / HZ)
>  			return -EINVAL;

You made opt unsigned or ?

>  		rose->idle = opt * 60 * HZ;
>  		return 0;

my 2 cents,

re,
 wh