[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190604133355.GE29894@pdeschrijver-desktop.Nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 16:33:55 +0300
From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
CC: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"Jonathan Hunter" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] NVIDIA Tegra clocksource driver improvements
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 09:59:38PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This series primarily unifies the driver code across all Tegra SoC
> generations. In a result the clocksources are allocated per-CPU on
> older Tegra's and have a higher rating than the arch-timer where
> appropriate, the newer Tegra210 is getting support for microsecond
> clocksource and the driver's code is getting much cleaner.
>
> The series was extensively tested on Tegra20 and Tegra30.
>
> Changelog:
>
> v4: In the comment to v3 Peter De Schrijver pointed out that arch-timer
> isn't affected by DVFS changes and thus it is preferred over tegra-timer
> on [T114, T210). Added new patch to address that: "Lower clocksource
> rating for some Tegra's".
>
> Daniel Lezcano suggested that it will be worthwhile to rename driver's
> source file as driver now covers more SoC generations than it initially
> did. Hence the new "Rename timer-tegra20.c to timer-tegra.c" patch.
>
> v3: Fixed compilation on ARM64. Turned out that it doesn't have the
> delay-timer, thanks to Nicolas Chauvet for the report.
>
> Added new "Support COMPILE_TEST universally" patch for better
> compile-test coverage.
>
> v2: Rebased on recent linux-next. Now all of #ifdef's are removed from the
> code due to the recent patch that generalized persistent clocksource.
>
> Couple other minor cosmetic changes.
Series Acked-By: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists