linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: rockchip: Add pin names for rk3288-veyron jaq, mickey, speedy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 04 Jun 2019 16:14:34 +0200
From:   Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     briannorris@...omium.org, ryandcase@...omium.org, mka@...omium.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: rockchip: Add pin names for rk3288-veyron jaq, mickey, speedy

Am Samstag, 25. Mai 2019, 01:33:09 CEST schrieb Douglas Anderson:
> This is like commit 0ca87bd5baa6 ("ARM: dts: rockchip: Add pin names
> for rk3288-veyron-jerry") and commit ca3516b32cd9 ("ARM: dts:
> rockchip: Add pin names for rk3288-veyron-minnie") but for 3 more
> veyron boards.
> 
> A few notes:
> - While there is most certainly duplication between all the veyron
>   boards, it still feels like it is sane to just have each board have
>   a full list of its pin names.  The format of "gpio-line-names" does
>   not lend itself to one-off overriding and besides it seems sane to
>   more fully match schematic names.  Also note that the extra
>   duplication here is only in source code and is unlikely to ever
>   change (since these boards are shipped).  Duplication in the .dtb
>   files is unavoidable.
> - veyron-jaq and veyron-mighty are very closely related and so I have
>   shared a single list for them both with comments on how they are
>   different.  This is just a typo fix on one of the boards, a possible
>   missing signal on one of the boards (or perhaps I was never given
>   the most recent schematics?) and dealing with the fact that one of
>   the two boards has full sized SD.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>

applied for 5.3 with Matthias Rb.

Thanks
Heiko