[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe31ff62-da28-3f32-5f9e-171e624213bf@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:16:12 -0600
From: shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Abhishek Goel <huntbag@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpupower : frequency-set -r option misses the last cpu in
related cpu list
On 5/29/19 8:21 AM, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday, May 29, 2019 2:12:34 PM CEST Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
>> Hi Abhishek,
>>
>> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 3:02 PM Abhishek Goel
>
> ...
>
>>> bitmask_setbit(cpus_chosen, cpus->cpu);
>>> cpus = cpus->next;
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> + /* Set the last cpu in related cpus list */
>>> + bitmask_setbit(cpus_chosen, cpus->cpu);
>>
>> Perhaps you could convert the while() loop to a do .. while(). That
>> should will ensure
>> that we terminate the loop after setting the last valid CPU.
>
> It would do exactly the same, right?
> IMHO it's not worth the extra hassle of resubmitting. Setting the last value
> outside a while loop is rather common.
>
> I do not have a CPU with related cores at hand.
> If you tested this it would be nice to see this pushed:
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
>
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux.git/
cpupower branch.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists