[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3Dv+hqnQHWU2nG5rB+hGrqbcDC3DUoNGZAzNGJgJwizA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 18:37:26 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dbueso@...e.de, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, e@...24.org,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-aio <linux-aio@...ck.org>, omar.kilani@...il.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal: remove the wrong signal_pending() check in restore_user_sigmask()
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 3:41 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> This is the minimal fix for stable, I'll send cleanups later.
>
> The commit 854a6ed56839a40f6b5d02a2962f48841482eec4 ("signal: Add
> restore_user_sigmask()") introduced the visible change which breaks
> user-space: a signal temporary unblocked by set_user_sigmask() can
> be delivered even if the caller returns success or timeout.
>
> Change restore_user_sigmask() to accept the additional "interrupted"
> argument which should be used instead of signal_pending() check, and
> update the callers.
>
> Reported-by: Eric Wong <e@...24.org>
> Fixes: 854a6ed56839a40f6b5d02a2962f48841482eec4 ("signal: Add restore_user_sigmask()")
> cc: stable@...r.kernel.org (v5.0+)
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
I hope Eric can test this with the original reproducer, or maybe someone
could create a test case that can be added into LTP.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists