[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190605060154.GJ22737@tuxbook-pro>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 23:01:54 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] (Qualcomm) UFS device reset support
On Tue 04 Jun 22:50 PDT 2019, Avri Altman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 12:22 AM Bjorn Andersson
> > <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This series exposes the ufs_reset line as a gpio, adds support for ufshcd to
> > > acquire and toggle this and then adds this to SDM845 MTP.
> > >
> > > Bjorn Andersson (3):
> > > pinctrl: qcom: sdm845: Expose ufs_reset as gpio
> > > scsi: ufs: Allow resetting the UFS device
> > > arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-mtp: Specify UFS device-reset GPIO
> >
> > Adding similar change as in sdm845-mtp to the not yet upstream
> > blueline dts, I validated this allows my micron UFS pixel3 to boot.
> >
> > Tested-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
> Maybe ufs_hba_variant_ops would be the proper place to add this?
>
Are you saying that these memories only need a reset when they are
paired with the Qualcomm host controller?
The way it's implemented it here is that the device-reset GPIO is
optional and only if you specify it we'll toggle the reset. So if your
board design has a UFS memory that requires a reset pulse during
initialization you specify this, regardless of which vendor your SoC
comes from.
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists