[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHttsrYVHXZTtC7fTRn-osH-yYzC-GUhpQJVapWp0UhPsGfZxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 15:48:49 +0800
From: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@...il.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/19] locking/rwsem: Implement lock handoff to prevent
lock starvation
Hi Waiman,
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 00:00, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
> With my patchset applied, the reader-writer ordering is still supposed
> to be preserved. Of course, there can be exceptions depending on the
> exact timing, but we can't rely on that to prevent deadlock.
This is exactly what I want to know. Thanks for the reply.
Thanks,
Yuyang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists