[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4e0e290-5fa7-899b-c26b-691bfc32e864@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 12:01:38 +0200
From: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, ptesarik@...e.com,
sboyd@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, mbrugger@...e.de, ssuloev@...altech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] clk: bcm2835: register Raspberry Pi's firmware clk
device
Am 05.06.19 um 11:11 schrieb Nicolas Saenz Julienne:
> On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 17:00 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de> writes:
>>
>>> Registers clk-raspberrypi as a platform device as part of the driver's
>>> probe sequence.
>> Similar to how we have VCHI register platform devices for the services
>> VCHI provides, shouldn't we have the firmware driver register the device
>> for clk_raspberrypi? Or put the clk provider in the fw driver instead
>> of a separate driver (no opinion on my part).
> Makes sense to me, I'll move the platform driver registration into the firmware
> driver.
Fine. Please keep in mind that you might need to add a MODULE_ALIAS
otherwise autoload won't work.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists