[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190605100942.bceke6yqjynuwk3z@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 12:09:42 +0200
From: "kraxel@...hat.com" <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: "Zhang, Tina" <tina.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
"intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Lv, Zhiyuan" <zhiyuan.lv@...el.com>,
"Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"Yuan, Hang" <hang.yuan@...el.com>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] vfio: Use capability chains to handle device
specific irq
Hi,
> > Really need to split for different planes? I'd like a
> > VFIO_IRQ_SUBTYPE_GFX_DISPLAY_EVENT
> > so user space can probe change for all.
> User space can choose to user different handlers according to the
> specific event. For example, user space might not want to handle every
> cursor event due to performance consideration. Besides, it can reduce
> the probe times, as we don't need to probe twice to make sure if both
> cursor plane and primary plane have been updated.
I'd suggest to use the value passed via eventfd for that, i.e. instead
of sending "1" unconditionally send a mask of changed planes.
cheers,
Gerd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists