lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190605115815.GG15030@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Jun 2019 12:58:15 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:     Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seqlock: mark raw_read_seqcount and read_seqcount_retry
 as __always_inline

On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 11:10:08AM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> If CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER is enabled function sched_clock() in
> kernel/time/sched_clock.c is marked as notrace. However, functions
> raw_read_seqcount and read_seqcount_retry are marked as inline. If
> CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING is set that will make the two functions
> tracable which they shouldn't.

Might be nice to elaborate a bit here on what goes from specifically for
seqlocks. I assume something ends up going recursive thanks to the tracing
code?

With that:

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>

Will

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ