lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO-hwJ+iRYS5+5XiCCG+RJQRCzAaUcxF-xxX-K-H1j+snVpoBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Jun 2019 14:29:49 +0200
From:   Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
To:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        "open list:HID CORE LAYER" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: hid-related 5.2-rc1 boot hang

On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 11:08 PM Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2019, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>
> > > Which should fix this. It is quite simple and safe, so if we get testing
> > > feedback relatively soon, we could go with the fix instead of dropping the
> > > product-id, your call.
> >
> > I should receive the M280 tomorrow, hopefully with the C52F. If the
> > receiver is correct and the tests are successful, I'd prefer to take
> > this one over the revert :)
>
> Agreed at this release phase. And if it doesn't work, immediate revert for
> now and proper fix for 5.3-rc1.
>

Mouse received, patch tested, patch validated.

Honestly, before fully reviewing the patch, I thought it would be more
5.3 material, but after a thorough review, there is nothing scary in
it and we can safely push it on top of the 5.2 branch.

I'm about to send the other mentioned reverts and push everything in 5.2-fixes

Cheers,
Benjamin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ