linux-kernel - [RFC v2 3/5] workqueue, memcontrol: make memcg throttle workqueue workers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed,  5 Jun 2019 09:36:48 -0400
From:   Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
To:     hannes@...xchg.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, lizefan@...wei.com,
        tj@...nel.org
Cc:     bsd@...hat.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, mhocko@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        steven.sistare@...cle.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        tom.hromatka@...cle.com, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [RFC v2 3/5] workqueue, memcontrol: make memcg throttle workqueue workers

Attaching a worker to a css_set isn't enough for all controllers to
throttle it.  In particular, the memory controller currently bypasses
accounting for kernel threads.

Support memcg accounting for cgroup-aware workqueue workers so that
they're appropriately throttled.

Another, probably better way to do this is to have kernel threads, or
even specifically cgroup-aware workqueue workers, call
memalloc_use_memcg and memalloc_unuse_memcg during cgroup migration
(memcg attach callback maybe).

Signed-off-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c          | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/workqueue_internal.h |  5 +++++
 mm/memcontrol.c             | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 89b90899bc09..c8cc69e296c0 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -50,6 +50,8 @@
 #include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
 #include <linux/nmi.h>
 #include <linux/cgroup.h>
+#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
+#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
 
 #include "workqueue_internal.h"
 
@@ -1829,6 +1831,28 @@ static inline bool worker_in_child_cgroup(struct worker *worker)
 	return (worker->flags & WORKER_CGROUP) && cgroup_parent(worker->cgroup);
 }
 
+/* XXX Put this in the memory controller's attach callback. */
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
+static void worker_unuse_memcg(struct worker *worker)
+{
+	if (worker->task->active_memcg) {
+		struct mem_cgroup *memcg = worker->task->active_memcg;
+
+		memalloc_unuse_memcg();
+		css_put(&memcg->css);
+	}
+}
+
+static void worker_use_memcg(struct worker *worker)
+{
+	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
+
+	worker_unuse_memcg(worker);
+	memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(task_get_css(worker->task, memory_cgrp_id));
+	memalloc_use_memcg(memcg);
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
+
 static void attach_worker_to_dfl_root(struct worker *worker)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -1841,6 +1865,7 @@ static void attach_worker_to_dfl_root(struct worker *worker)
 		rcu_read_lock();
 		worker->cgroup = task_dfl_cgroup(worker->task);
 		rcu_read_unlock();
+		worker_unuse_memcg(worker);
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * TODO Modify the cgroup migration path to guarantee that a
@@ -1880,6 +1905,7 @@ static void attach_worker_to_cgroup(struct worker *worker,
 
 	if (cgroup_attach_kthread(cgroup) == 0) {
 		worker->cgroup = cgroup;
+		worker_use_memcg(worker);
 	} else {
 		/*
 		 * Attach failed, so attach to the default root so the
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue_internal.h b/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
index 3ad5861258ca..f254b93edc2c 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
+++ b/kernel/workqueue_internal.h
@@ -79,6 +79,11 @@ work_func_t wq_worker_last_func(struct task_struct *task);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_MEMCG
+static inline void worker_use_memcg(struct worker *worker) {}
+static inline void worker_unuse_memcg(struct worker *worker) {}
+#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
+
 /*
  * A barrier work running in a cgroup-aware worker pool needs to specify a
  * cgroup.  For simplicity, WQ_BARRIER_CGROUP makes the worker stay in its
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 81a0d3914ec9..1a80931b124a 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2513,9 +2513,31 @@ static void memcg_schedule_kmem_cache_create(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 
 static inline bool memcg_kmem_bypass(void)
 {
-	if (in_interrupt() || !current->mm || (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+	if (in_interrupt())
 		return true;
-	return false;
+
+	if (unlikely(current->flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)) {
+		struct cgroup *parent;
+
+		/*
+		 * memcg should throttle cgroup-aware workers.  Infer the
+		 * worker is cgroup-aware by its presence in a non-root cgroup.
+		 *
+		 * This test won't detect a cgroup-aware worker attached to the
+		 * default root, but in that case memcg doesn't need to
+		 * throttle it anyway.
+		 *
+		 * XXX One alternative to this awkward block is adding a
+		 * cgroup-aware-worker bit to task_struct.
+		 */
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		parent = cgroup_parent(task_dfl_cgroup(current));
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+
+		return !parent;
+	}
+
+	return !current->mm || (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.21.0