linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 00/10] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: support for mv88e6250

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190604.201122.810789004477157679.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 04 Jun 2019 20:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Rasmus.Villemoes@...vas.se
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 00/10] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: support for
 mv88e6250

From: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 07:34:22 +0000

> This adds support for the mv88e6250 chip. Initially based on the
> mv88e6240, this time around, I've been through each ->ops callback and
> checked that it makes sense, either replacing with a 6250 specific
> variant or dropping it if no equivalent functionality seems to exist
> for the 6250. Along the way, I found a few oddities in the existing
> code, mostly sent as separate patches/questions.
> 
> The one relevant to the 6250 is the ieee_pri_map callback, where the
> existing mv88e6085_g1_ieee_pri_map() is actually wrong for many of the
> existing users. I've put the mv88e6250_g1_ieee_pri_map() patch first
> in case some of the existing chips get switched over to use that and
> it is deemed important enough for -stable.
 ...

Series applied, thanks.