[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d897559e-fcc7-6733-e117-e81ef3739ab1@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 16:13:03 +0100
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Herrenschmidt, Benjamin" <benh@...zon.com>
Cc: "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
"paulmck@...ux.ibm.com" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Hawa, Hanna" <hhhawa@...zon.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com" <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"Shenhar, Talel" <talel@...zon.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Chocron, Jonathan" <jonnyc@...zon.com>,
"Krupnik, Ronen" <ronenk@...zon.com>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"Hanoch, Uri" <hanochu@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] edac: add support for Amazon's Annapurna Labs EDAC
Hi guys,
On 31/05/2019 06:14, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 01:15:33AM +0000, Herrenschmidt, Benjamin wrote:
>> This isn't terribly helpful, there's nothing telling anybody which of
>> those files corresponds to an ARM SoC :-)
>
> drivers/edac/altera_edac.c is one example.
>
> Also, James and I have a small writeup on how an arm driver should look
> like, we just need to polish it up and post it.
>
> James?
Yes I should get on with that. Its mostly for platforms which end up with multiple
piecemeal drivers and some co-ordination is needed. It doesn't look like that will be a
problem here.
>> That said ...
>>
>> You really want a single EDAC driver that contains all the stuff for
>> the caches, the memory controller, etc... ?
This has to be platform specific as it has integration-time dependencies and firmware
dependencies. Doing it as a platform driver matched from the machine-compatible may be
more straightforward today.
The DT will already say "compatible = arm,cortex-a57" for the Alpine-v2, what that
'edac_l1_l2' node is telling us is the integration/firmware stuff has been done, and the
imp-def instructions can be used.
Thanks,
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists