linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] USB: sisusbvga: Remove unneeded variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190605173219.GC27700@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Jun 2019 19:32:19 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Hariprasad Kelam <hariprasad.kelam@...il.com>
Cc:     Thomas Winischhofer <thomas@...ischhofer.net>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: sisusbvga: Remove unneeded variable

On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 10:49:08PM +0530, Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> fix below warning reported by coccicheck
> 
> drivers/usb/misc/sisusbvga/sisusb.c:1753:5-8: Unneeded variable: "ret".
> Return "0" on line 1877
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hariprasad.kelam@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/misc/sisusbvga/sisusb.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/misc/sisusbvga/sisusb.c b/drivers/usb/misc/sisusbvga/sisusb.c
> index ea06f1f..dfe2ed1 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/misc/sisusbvga/sisusb.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/misc/sisusbvga/sisusb.c
> @@ -1750,7 +1750,7 @@ static int sisusb_setup_screen(struct sisusb_usb_data *sisusb,
>  static int sisusb_set_default_mode(struct sisusb_usb_data *sisusb,
>  		int touchengines)
>  {
> -	int ret = 0, i, j, modex, bpp, du;
> +	int i, j, modex, bpp, du;
>  	u8 sr31, cr63, tmp8;
>  	static const char attrdata[] = {
>  		0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07,
> @@ -1874,7 +1874,7 @@ static int sisusb_set_default_mode(struct sisusb_usb_data *sisusb,
>  
>  	SETIREG(SISCR, 0x34, 0x44);	/* we just set std mode #44 */
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	return 0;

If this function can not fail, why is it returning anything at all?
Please fix that up at the same time.

thanks,

greg k-h