linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] arch: riscv: add board and SoC DT file support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7h36kogchx.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date:   Wed, 05 Jun 2019 10:36:58 -0700
From:   Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] arch: riscv: add board and SoC DT file support

Hi Paul,

Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com> writes:

> Add support for building flattened DT files from DT source files under
> arch/riscv/boot/dts.  Follow existing kernel precedent from other SoC
> architectures.  Start our board support by adding initial support for
> the SiFive FU540 SoC and the first development board that uses it, the
> SiFive HiFive Unleashed A00.
>
> This third version of the patch set adds I2C data for the chip,
> incorporates all remaining changes that riscv-pk was making
> automatically, and addresses a comment from Rob Herring
> <robh@...nel.org>.
>
> Boot-tested on v5.2-rc1 on a HiFive Unleashed A00 board, using the
> BBL and open-source FSBL, with modifications to pass in the DTB
> file generated by these patches.

Tested this series on top of v5.2-rc3 on HiFive Unleashed board using
OpenSBI + mainline u-boot (master branch as of today).

Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>

> This patch series can be found, along with the PRCI patch set
> and the DT macro prerequisite patch, at:
>
> https://github.com/sifive/riscv-linux/tree/dev/paulw/dts-v5.2-rc1

nit: I only see this series in that branch, not any of the prerequisite
patches you mentioned, which made me assume I could this series alone on
top of v5.2-rc3, which worked just fine.

Kevin