[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b70cf8c1f901ea09abbdb22dd28244b18fd1a39d.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 22:22:05 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: do not use C++ style comments in uapi headers
On Wed, 2019-06-05 at 07:10 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 01:10:41PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 3:21 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
[]
> > This means we cannot reliably use uint{8,16,32,64}_t in UAPI headers.
>
> We should not be doing that as they are in the userspace "namespace" of
> variables, not in the kernel namespace. We've been over this many times
> in the past :(
Just not very successfully...
$ git grep -w -P 'u?_?int(?:8|16|32|64)_t' include/uapi | wc -l
342
$ git grep -w -P --name-only 'u?_?int(?:8|16|32|64)_t' include/uapi | wc -l
13
Documentation helps a bit, checkpatch helps as well.
Maintainer knowledge and vigilance probably helps the most.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists