[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 14:34:00 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
hpa@...or.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
dave.hansen@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com, adobriyan@...il.com,
aubrey.li@...el.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 1/3] proc: add /proc/<pid>/arch_status
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 09:22:34 +0800 Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> The architecture specific information of the running processes
> could be useful to the userland. Add /proc/<pid>/arch_status
> interface support to examine process architecture specific
> information externally.
I'll grab these for some testing. I can merge them up if the x86
maintainers are OK with it all. However I think it's best that these
be merged via an x86 tree, please.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists