[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 06:20:28 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, jikos@...nel.org,
benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, agross@...nel.org,
david.brown@...aro.org, hdegoede@...hat.com,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] HID: quirks: Refactor ELAN 400 and 401 handling
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> There needs to be coordination between hid-quirks and the elan_i2c driver
> about which devices are handled by what drivers. Currently, both use
> whitelists, which results in valid devices being unhandled by default,
> when they should not be rejected by hid-quirks. This is quickly becoming
> an issue.
>
> Since elan_i2c has a maintained whitelist of what devices it will handle,
> use that to implement a blacklist in hid-quirks so that only the devices
> that need to be handled by elan_i2c get rejected by hid-quirks, and
> everything else is handled by default. The downside is the whitelist and
> blacklist need to be kept in sync.
>
> Suggested-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-quirks.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/input/mouse/elan_i2c_core.c | 4 ++
> 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists