[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190606062018.GA26745@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 08:20:18 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/16] mm: consolidate the get_user_pages*
implementations
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 11:01:17PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> I started reviewing this one patch, and it's kind of messy figuring out
> if the code motion preserves everything because of
> all the consolidation from other places, plus having to move things in
> and out of the ifdef blocks. So I figured I'd check and see if this is
> going to make it past RFC status soon, and if it's going before or after
> Ira's recent RFC ("RDMA/FS DAX truncate proposal").
I don't like the huge moves either, but I can't really think of any
better way to do it. Proposals welcome, though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists